Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation and Hisense Electronica Mexico, S.A. de C.V., et al.
District Court, E.D. Texas
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PHENIX LONGHORN, LLC, § § Plaintiff, § § v. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-477-RWS-RSP § AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and § HISENSE ELECTRONICA MEXICO, § S.A. de C.V., et al., § § Defendants. § ORDER The above-captioned action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Now before the Court are (1) Defendant AUO Corporation’s Objections to Report and Recommendation Regarding AUO’s Motion for Summary Judgment Under 35 U.S.C. § 271(g) (Docket No. 430); and (2)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ntp, Inc. v. Research in Motion, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Biotec Biologische Naturverpackungen Gmbh & Co. Kg, Plaintiff-Cross v. Biocorp, Inc. And Novamont, S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Bayer Ag and Bayer Corporation v. Housey Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Yangaroo Inc. v. Destiny Media Technologies Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010