Legal Opinion

Wildermuth v. LaGuardia

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1943Published

1Opinion of the CourtColden, J.

This proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act challenges the legality of the appointment by the Mayor of the City of New York, on May 4, 1943, of Dr. George H. Chatfield as a member of the Board of Education of the City of New York representing the Borough of Queens.

The petitioner contends that under section 866 of the Education Law a person is eligible for appointment as a member of the Board of Education representing a borough of the City of New York, only if he has resided in the borough for which he is to be appointed for a period of at least three years immediately…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Revocation of Ancillary Letters Testamentary of the Estate of NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. In re the Probate of the Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Hislop v. TaaffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. New York Central Railroad v. GillespieNew York Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API