McCloskey v. Barr
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
In Equity. Bill for partition and accounting, filed by Sarah E. Mc-Closkey and others against Samuel Barr and others. On hearing as to sufficiency of pleas.
1Opinion of the CourtJacicson, J.
This cause is now before the court on the sufficiency of the pleas filed herein by Ed. A. Foy, William A. Blanchard, Henry Van Mater, and others, defendants, adopting the same, and agreeing to be bound by the action of the court thereon, to the second amended bill, filed by complainants November 7, 1888. The case made and presented by said second amended bill is briefly this: The complainants allege that they, together with certain of the defendants other than those interposing said pleas, were the legal heirs of Mary Jane Barr, who was seised in fee in remainder of the 160 4-10 acres of land…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Farley v. KittsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Poorman v. D. O. Mills & Co.California Supreme Court · 1868
- Larimore v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1875
- Thompson v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. Shoshone Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Hemphill Et Ux. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
- Acton v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- McBryde Sugar Co. v. Koloa Sugar Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1908
- Guadalupe Co. Com'rs v. AnayaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.