Envirocare of Utah, Inc. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:
Federal agencies may, and sometimes do, permit persons to intervene in administrative proceedings even though these persons would not have standing to challenge the agency’s final action in federal court. Agencies, of course, are not constrained by Article III of the Constitution; nor are they governed by judicially-created standing doctrines restricting access to the federal courts. The criteria for establishing “administrative standing” therefore may permissibly be less demanding than the criteria for “judicial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Tourus Records, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Fund Democracy, LLC v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Weber v. Cranston School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Chamber of Commerce of United States v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.