Legal Opinion

In re Feingold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent converted to his own use the sum of $112.29 which he collected in March, 1935, from one Walter I'. Eisenberg, against whom he had entered a judgment in 1928 on behalf of his client, the Sterling Diamond and Watch Company. Concededly he used the money a few days after receiving it. In June, 1936, B. Gutter & Son, Inc., which had taken over the business formerly conducted by the Sterling Diamond and Watch Company, inquired of the respondent as to the Eisenberg account. He admitted he had collected some money and promised to furnish detailed information regarding the matter but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sherman v. Yankee Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re CrosbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  2. In re GlaubmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API