Robin v. Royal Improvement Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, Justice.
Johnson’s Building Mart and its insurer, Allied Mutual Insurance Company, 1 seek review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals awarding against relators alone benefits to respondent, George Robin, for temporary total and permanent partial disability from the occupational disease of asbestosis. The principal issue is whether the award should be equitably apportioned between Johnson’s and prior employers inasmuch as the asbestos exposure with Johnson’s was only a small part of the total. The court held it could not apportion on the facts herein and we affirm…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bisbee v. RuppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Lease v. Pemtom, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Michels v. American Hoist & DerrickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Wallace v. Hanson Silo CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Notch v. Victory Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Busse v. Quality Insulation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Halverson v. Larrivy Plumbing & Heating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Gilmore v. Little Jack's Steak HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Stillson v. Peterson & Hede Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990