Legal Opinion

Tampa Electric Company v. Crosby

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 9, 1964No. 33127PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

168 So.2d 70 (1964)

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY and Globe Indemnity Company, Petitioners,

v.

William A. CROSBY and the Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents.

No. 33127.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 9, 1964.

Rehearing Denied November 6, 1964.

Calvin A. Pope, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, for petitioners.

Morrice S. Uman, Tampa, for respondent William A. Crosby.

Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondent Florida Industrial Commission.

THORNAL, Justice.

By a petition for certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hardy v. City of Tarpon SpringsSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Andrews v. CBS DIVISION, ETC.Supreme Court of Florida · 1960
  3. Andrews v. Strecker Body BuildersSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Lucom v. PotterSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
  5. Moses v. RH Wright & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Flesche v. Interstate WarehouseDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Mayflower Property, Inc. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  3. City of Gainesville v. SEABOARD COASTLINE, ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Brock v. Sey Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
  5. Dade County School Board v. JacksonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API