Legal Opinion

In Re Succession of Collett

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 2009No. 09-70PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

| Appellants, Mary Lou Collett Dayhuff and Naomi Ruth Collett Ebarb, claim that the trial court erred in its interpretation of their father’s testament, thereby depriving Dayhuff and Ebarb of their portion of his estate. The testament, which pre-dated the abolition of forced heirship, left the forced portion of his estate to his children. Reasoning that the law in effect at the time of George Collett’s death governed the succession rights of the parties, the trial court determined that one hundred percent of George Collett’s estate belonged to Dayhuff and Ebarb’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Succession of BoyterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  2. Cleland v. City of Lake CharlesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Adams v. WillisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Succession of ColeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Succession of DeanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Succession of LeavinesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Succession of CelestinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Succession of DeanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API