(PC) Williams v. LaCoursier
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID EARL WILLIAMS, No. 2:24-cv-0394 DJC SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 MARK LaCOURSIER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 18 §1983. Before the court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint for screening. For the reasons 19 set forth below, the court finds plaintiff states a potentially cognizable due process claim against 20 defendants but states no other claims under §1983. The court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.