Legal Opinion

Swiderski v. Moodenbaugh

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 8, 1942No. 918PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.

Since the hearing in this case on the motion to stay proceedings,1 counsel for defendant have called the attention of the court to a decision by the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, decided March 3, 1942, and have requested re-exami'nation. This case is entitled Dacia Royster v. Arthur F. Lederle, United States District Judge,2 128 F.2d 197.

There the Circuit Court of Appeals on mandamus proceedings refused to direct Honorable Arthur F. Lederle, United States District Judge “to vacate and set aside his order of continuance entered in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. National Bondholders Corporation v. McClinticCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Royster v. LederleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. Swiderski v. MoodenbaughDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1942
  4. Ex Parte WagnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Bedgisoff v. CushmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Boone v. LightnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Semler v. OertwigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. Plesniak v. WiegandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  5. Register v. BourquinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API