Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Codarre

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1961Published

1Dissent

Froessel, J. (dissenting).

I dissent and vote to affirm.

This is petitioner’s third application for coram nobis relief. In his two prior applications he raised the following points: (1) that he was insane at the time of the commission of the offense, at the time of the plea of guilty and at the time of sentencing; (2) that he was not adequately represented by counsel; and (3) that by reason of his illness — epilepsy—and his extreme youth he was incompetent to plead guilty. Both applications were denied without a hearing, and each denial was affirmed by the Appellate Division, from whose…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. SadnessNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. People v. KendricksNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. People v. BoehmNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. People v. CodarreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  5. People v. Codarre, New York County Courts1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API