People v. Codarre
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Froessel, J. (dissenting).
I dissent and vote to affirm.
This is petitioner’s third application for coram nobis relief. In his two prior applications he raised the following points: (1) that he was insane at the time of the commission of the offense, at the time of the plea of guilty and at the time of sentencing; (2) that he was not adequately represented by counsel; and (3) that by reason of his illness — epilepsy—and his extreme youth he was incompetent to plead guilty. Both applications were denied without a hearing, and each denial was affirmed by the Appellate Division, from whose…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. SadnessNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- People v. KendricksNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- People v. BoehmNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- People v. CodarreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- People v. Codarre, New York County Courts1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.