Legal Opinion

Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Co. v. Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1949No. 7037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS,:J.:

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of' the Common Pleas Court of Hamilton County in favor of the plaintiff, rendered upon a motion of the plaintiff for judgment non obstante veredicto in favor of the defendant.

The action was brought by plaintiff to recover for damages to its conduits sustained when the defendant, in repairing a break in a water line in a street in the City of Cincinnati,, broke through the conduits and cut? the telephone cables contained therein.

The answer was in effect a general denial.

The plaintiff alleged four specifications of…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bell, Inc. v. CooperHamilton County Municipal Court · 1985
  2. Tom Shaw, Inc. v. Robert E. Derecktor of Rhode Island, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
  3. Cincinnati & Suburban Bell Telephone Co. v. Carter Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API