Rich v. State

OPINION ON REMAND

JOHN CAYCE, Chief Justice.

I. Introduction

Rodney L. Rich appeals from his convictions for burglary of a habitation and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Appellant complains that the trial court erred by preventing him from asking veni-re members during voir dire about their views on what constitutes reasonable doubt. The State concedes that appellant was entitled to question prospective jurors about their concepts of reasonable doubt but asserts that the trial court’s error in limiting the voir dire was harmless. Because we. agree that the error was harmless, we affirm.

I…