Prather v. Martin
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The appellants brought these two suits, consolidated below, to enjoin the Faulkner County Collector from collecting real estate taxes attributable to increases in assessed valuations that were assertedly made without notice to the complaining landowners. The trial judge, finding that “the receipt of notice makes no difference,” dismissed the complaints for want of equity.
Both cases involve a tract-by-tract reassessment that was undertaken in 1972. That procedure was discussed in detail in Dierks Forests v. Shell, 240 Ark. 966, 403 S.W. 2d 83 (1966), where we pointed…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Glidden v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Dierks Forests v. ShellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- Jones v. CrouchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haseman v. Union Bank of MenaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1992
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1996