O'Donnell's Corp. v. Ambroise
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
858 So.2d 1138 (2003)
O'DONNELL'S CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
Himrod AMBROISE, Appellee.
No. 5D03-324.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
November 7, 2003.
Christopher C. Cathcart of Ossinsky & Cathcart, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PLEUS, J.
This is an appeal of an "Order Remanding Petition for Relief from an Unlawful Employment Practice." We conclude it is not an appealable order.
Section 120.68(1), Florida Statutes, states:
A party who is adversely affected by final agency action is entitled to judicial review. A preliminary, procedural, or…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- English v. McCrarySupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Mandico v. Taos Const., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Joshua v. City of GainesvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- MacHules v. Department of Admin.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Florida House of Representatives v. CristSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Allan and Conrad v. University of Cent. Fl.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Pro Tech Monitoring, Inc. v. State, Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Sowell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- City of Ocala v. GardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.