Legal Opinion
Brondfield v. Paramount Pictures Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 9, 1951PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKleinfeld, J.
Motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendants, Paramount Pictures Corporation and WallisHazen, Incorporated, during the pendency of this action, from displaying or showing to the public generally the motion picture production entitled “ That’s My Boy.”
*884The defendant, Wallis-Hazen, Incorporated, produced a motion picture entitled “ That’s My Boy ”, which is currently being distributed by the defendant Paramount Pictures Corporation, for exhibition in theatres throughout the United States and also throughout the world.
The plaintiff is the author of a short story entitled “ That’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crescent Tool Co. v. Kilborn & Bishop Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc. v. Majestic Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Becker v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Manners v. Triangle Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- Patten v. Superior Talking Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Curtis v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Litwin v. MadduxNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Curtis v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Glory Records, Inc. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaNew York Supreme Court · 1961