Legal Opinion

Ratcliffe's Administrator v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 29, 1919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Carter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

In this action by John R. Ratcliffe’s administrator against the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company to recover damages for his death, a demurrer was sustained to the petition as amended and the petition dismissed. Plaintiff appeals.

The allegations of the petition as amended are in substance as follows: As part of its line of railway, the defendant maintains a bridge across the Little Sandy river. The bridge is located in the town of Hitchens, a place of about 1,000 inhabitants. At all times during the day and night, the bridge is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ch. & Ohio Ry. Co. v. Lang's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Curd's Administratrix v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Fields v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  4. Johnson v. Sandy Valley & Elkhorn Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Lapp v. Louisville, Henderson & St. Louis Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  2. Vance's Adm'r v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API