Legal Opinion
In Re Investigation Regarding Ringwood Fact Finding Committee Re Violation of N. J. S. A. 19:34-38.1
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided August 8, 1974Published
1Opinion of the Court
65 N.J. 512 (1974)
324 A.2d 1
IN THE MATTER OF INVESTIGATION REGARDING RINGWOOD FACT FINDING COMMITTEE RE VIOLATION OF N.J.S.A. 19:34-38.1.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued March 18, 1974.
Decided August 8, 1974.
Mr. Joseph D.J. Gourley, Passaic County Prosecutor, argued the cause for the appellant pro se (Mr. Gary Schlyen, Assistant Passaic County Prosecutor, of counsel).
Mr. Martin F. Murphy argued the cause for the respondents citizens of Ringwood (Messrs. Johnson, Johnson & Murphy, attorneys).
Mr. Alfred J. Luciani, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of New Jersey…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Zicarelli v. New Jersey State Commission of InvestigationSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Confiscation CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.