Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 7, 1991No. 1—90—1210, 1—90—1253 consPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE JIGANTI
delivered the opinion of the court:
These consolidated appeals stem from a negligence action brought by the plaintiffs, Bruce E. Mitchell and his wife, Mary J. Mitchell, against the defendants, the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) and the City of Chicago (City). On motions by the CTA and the City, the trial court granted summary judgments in favor of both of the defendants and against the plaintiffs on the grounds that no duty was owed to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs have appealed, contending that a duty existed under the facts of this case.
On December 1, 1983,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lamkin v. TownerIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Widlowski v. Durkee FoodsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Crutchfield v. Yellow Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Rotheli v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Poelker v. MacOn Community Unit School District No. 5Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Block v. LOHAN ASSOCIATES, INC.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Trevino v. Flash Cab Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Wolowinski v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Scerba v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Suchy v. The City of GenevaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.