Legal Opinion

Trent v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1916No. 3934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri; Arba S. Van Valkenburgh, Judge. I. E. Trent and another were convicted of fraudulent use of the mails, and they bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

HOOK, Circuit Judge.

Trent and Erad were convicted of fraudulent use of the mails (Penal Code, § 215), as charged in three counts of the indictment. The scheme to defraud may be briefly described as follows:

The accused, operating as the Oakland City Townsite & Emigration Company, obtained title to 420 acres of land in Oklahoma. The land was on the summit of a range of hills called the Poteau Mountains. It was very rough and rocky, and embraced abrupt hills and deep ravines or canyons. It was devoid of merchantable timber,’ unfit for cultivation, four or five miles from the nearest railroad,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stewart v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. Exchange Bank v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. McKnight v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Weiss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  2. Blue v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943
  3. Samuels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. Bryant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
  5. Newingham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API