Legal Opinion

Blue Bell, Inc. v. Owens

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 13, 1970No. 43608PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVISON, Justice.

This is an original proceeding to review an order of the State Industrial Court sitting en banc, affirming an award of the trial judge allowing respondent Melba Owens, claimant below, compensation benefits under the provisions of the Oklahoma Workmen’s Compensation Act.

Parties will be referred to as they appeared before the State Industrial Court. Respondent is engaged in the business of manufacturing and processing clothing. It operates a plant for the conduct of such business at Seminole, Oklahoma.

It is admitted that such business is hazardous within the provisions of 85…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Company v. HooverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc. v. HighfillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
  3. Yahola Sand and Gravel Company v. NuttSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Gregory & Gregory Construction Co. v. NaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  5. Loague v. Watson & WatsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Nichols Hills v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. Howey v. Babcock & Wilcox CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. YARBRO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. GriffithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  4. Cassidy v. NoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. People v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API