Legal Opinion

Speir v. City of Brooklyn

New York City Court

Decided February 18, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by S. Fleet Speir against the city of Brooklyn to recover damages resulting from a fire caused by an authorized display of fire-wurks. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtClement, C. J.

The plaintiff, on November 1, 1887, was the owner and occupant of a house on Montague street, near the Academy of Music in this city, and on that evening there was a display of fire-works at the corner of Clinton and Montague streets. A political meeting was held at the academy, and the fire-works, consisting of bombs, rockets, and Roman candles, were exhibited for that reason. A permit was given by the mayor, in writing, to the person who received the contract, and such permit named the place where the fire-works should be set off. It is undisputed that the display was extensive and “unusual…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cohen v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Heeg v. . LichtNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Lee v. . the Village of Sandy HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  4. Burford v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Smith v. . City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Speir v. City of BrooklynNew York City Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API