Coors Porcelain Co. v. Grenfell
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson
This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act which differs from many other “heart” accident cases originating before the Industrial Commission, in that here there is no conflicting testimony of witnesses and essential evidence borders on the meagre. The only witnesses in the case whose testimony bears on the question involved were two — both called by claimant Grenfell, the father of the deceased.
Dr. Howlett stated that the autopsy showed that the heart was “in bad shape and had been for a time.” He gave no definite opinion as to the cause of death. One of his statements was that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ellermann v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
- Industrial Commission v. WetzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Industrial Commission v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- Industrial Commission v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1955
- Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Black Forest Fox Ranch, Inc. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
- Industrial Commission of Colorado v. DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951