Legal Opinion

Coors Porcelain Co. v. Grenfell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 19, 1942No. 15,042PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Act which differs from many other “heart” accident cases originating before the Industrial Commission, in that here there is no conflicting testimony of witnesses and essential evidence borders on the meagre. The only witnesses in the case whose testimony bears on the question involved were two — both called by claimant Grenfell, the father of the deceased.

Dr. Howlett stated that the autopsy showed that the heart was “in bad shape and had been for a time.” He gave no definite opinion as to the cause of death. One of his statements was that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ellermann v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Industrial Commission v. WetzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  3. Industrial Commission v. McKennaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  2. Industrial Commission v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  3. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  4. Black Forest Fox Ranch, Inc. v. GarrettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. Industrial Commission of Colorado v. DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API