Legal Opinion
Szopinski v. MJ Mechanical Services, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 14, 1995PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We conclude that Supreme Court properly granted the motion of plaintiffs for partial summary judgment pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1). To access the penthouse work site where he was installing wiring for a boiler, Ramon Szopinski (plaintiff) was required to climb an extension ladder to reach the first floor roof of the shopping mall, and then was required to climb a ladder that was permanently affixed to the exterior of the mall to reach the roof where the penthouse was located.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Figueroa v. Manhattanville CollegeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Kozlowski v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Schelble v. ADF Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brennan v. RCP AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Dorr v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Holka v. Mt. Mercy AcademyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Spiteri v. Chatwal HotelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Oprea v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.