Couch v. Booker
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
ARTHUR J. TARNOW, District Judge.
Daniel Barry Couch, (“Petitioner”), filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which he challenges his conviction for second-degree murder, M.C.L.A. 750.317. Because petitioner was denied the right to retain the counsel of his choice and was also denied the effective assistance of trial counsel by his court-appointed attorney, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is conditionally granted.
I. Background
Petitioner was convicted following a jury trial…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. HowardDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- Maslonka v. HoffnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021