Legal Opinion

Couch v. Booker

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 3, 2009No. Civil 2:06-15119PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ARTHUR J. TARNOW, District Judge.

Daniel Barry Couch, (“Petitioner”), filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which he challenges his conviction for second-degree murder, M.C.L.A. 750.317. Because petitioner was denied the right to retain the counsel of his choice and was also denied the effective assistance of trial counsel by his court-appointed attorney, the petition for writ of habeas corpus is conditionally granted.

I. Background

Petitioner was convicted following a jury trial…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. HowardDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
  2. Maslonka v. HoffnerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API