Legal Opinion

Brazy v. Brazy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1958PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The action in the California court involved both the element of custody (defendant’s right to have the daughters visit him) and of support (defendant’s payments for support of the son). We are of the opinion that the California court had jurisdiction of the subject matter in both respects and it had personal jurisdiction over defendant by reason of personal service upon him in California.

No argument has been made to us that there was any infirmity in the personal service upon the defendant at Santa *359Barbara. It is, thus, unnecessary to consider whether the actions of his California counsel…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Halvey v. HalveySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Kovacs v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. State Ex Rel. Hannon v. EislerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hatch v. HatchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  5. Setzer v. SetzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Teague v. Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa IndiansWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Krause v. KrauseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Jones v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Anderson v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Sheridan v. SheridanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API