Legal Opinion

Hammel v. Gould

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 3, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal : Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the Court

Jones, E. H. J.; Swing, J., concurring; Jones, O. B., J., dissenting in separate opinion.

Plaintiff, Elizabeth C. Hammel, filed her petition for' partition of the property described therein. Her right to partition depends upon a construction of the will of Richard Gould, deceased. Richard Gould died in the year 1879, leaving a widow and six children, several of whom were minors. At the time of his death he was seized in fee of the property of which partition is sought. The widow still *228lives and has never remarried. Five of the children are living and are of full age.

Items I and II of the will…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. East v. Garrett & WifeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ellis v. Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Eric Von Schlichten v. Vincent MooneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API