United States v. Roseann Marie Pratt
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MERRITT, Chief Judge.
The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether the District Court properly interpreted and applied the “safety-valve” provision, 18 U.S.C. § 3553(f), when sentencing the Defendant. The statute requires the sentencing court to disregard the statutory minimum sentence in certain cases and to sentence the defendant pursuant to the applicable Sentencing Guidelines instead. The safety-valve provision was applied to Defendant and she was sentenced pursuant to the guidelines. Defendant appeals her sentence, arguing that Section 3553(f) creates a new mandatory minimum sentence…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Kemi IdowuCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Lionel Vincent CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Shawn P. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. LangeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- United States v. BoydDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007
- United States v. ShockleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002