Legal Opinion
Maksud Sayied v. White
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided March 15, 2004No. 03-2253PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
Abul Maksud Sayied appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his complaint for failure to comply with Rule 8(a) and (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Although Sayied has expressly requested oral argument, we conclude that no substantial question is presented by the appeal and therefore deny the motion. See 1st Cir. R. 27(c). Sayied’s de facto request to append an addendum to his reply brief is granted.
The district court’s dismissal for failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 8 is subject to review only for abuse of discretion. Kuehl v. F.D.I.C., 8 F.3d…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- David E. And Jean E. Kuehl v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
3Cited by13 opinions
- Belanger v. BNY Mellon Asset Management, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Cintron-Luna v. Roman-BultronDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2009
- Rhode Island v. Atl. Richfield Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2018
- Agnes Macua v. P State of New Hampshire, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
- Ashley Menwer, Plaintiff v. School Administrative Unit #15, and School Administrative Unit #37, DefendantsDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.