Ponterio v. Regan
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold J. Hughes, J.
The petition for a judgment annulling the respondent’s determination of December 18, 1986, which decided that petitioner’s retirement application was received by the Comptroller one day too late to permit him to be eligible for the early retirement incentive credit offered by his employer, and declaring that he is entitled to the benefit of Laws of 1986 (ch 177), will be granted, without costs. Laws of 1984 (ch 665) authorized employers participating in the New York State Retirement System to offer their employees an early retire*588ment incentive program.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cady v. County of BroomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Baker v. ReganNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Baker v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Merrill v. RalstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Young v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1999