Legal Opinion
Pedone v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 8, 1957No. 39-55, 40-55PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MADDEN, Judge.
These actions are for the recovery of income taxes alleged to have been improperly assessed for the year 1952 against plaintiffs Sam and Rose Pedone, jointly as husband and wife, and against plaintiffs Charles and Marian Pedone, jointly as husband and wife, in the amounts of $2,756.64 and $2,797.64, respectively, plus interest. Since the actions were instituted, plaintiff Sam Pedone has died and his wife, Rose *289Pedone, has been substituted as executrix of his estate.
During the period in question, plaintiffs Sam and Charles Pedone, weré equal partners in the Pedone Lathing &…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lilly v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Woodside Acres v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alpenglow Botanicals, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Max Sobel Wholesale Liquors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Gajewski v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
- Solon Decorating Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Solon Decorating Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Sidney Zehman and Irene Zehman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Milton Wolf and Roslyn Wolf v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.