City of Horn Lake v. City of Southaven
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, Justice,
for the Court.
¶ 1. The Chancery Court of DeSoto County found that the City of Southaven’s proposed annexation was reasonable and granted the annexation. We affirm.
BACKGROUND FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
¶ 2. The City of Southaven (“the City”) sought to annex three separate parcels; specifically, property to the northeast (the “Northeast Parcel”), to the south and to the northwest of the city. The Northeast Parcel is bordered on three sides by the City of Southaven and, on the fourth, by the City of Olive Branch.
¶ 3. On March 5, 2004, the City filed its petition to annex in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matter of Boundaries of City of JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of Extension of Boundaries of ColumbusMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- MUNICIPAL BOUNDARIES OF CITY v. MadisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Extension of Boundaries of City of RidgelandMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Mun. Boundaries of City of BiloxiMississippi Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Extension of Boundaries of City of Tupelo v. City of TupeloMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
- Enlarging, Extending & Defining the Corporate Limits & Boundaries of Horn Lake v. Town of WallsMississippi Supreme Court · 2011
- Coahoma County, Mississippi v. City of Clarksdale, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2019
- Farrell v. BabbMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- City of Horn Lake, Mississippi v. Town of Walls, MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.