Legal Opinion

Rafert v. Scroggins

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Morgan Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an action by Scroggins against Rafert on an account for work and labor. Issue, trial by the court, finding and judgment for the plaintiff Motion for new trial by defendant overruled, and exception.

Two points are made by the appellant for a reversal; first, that the court excluded competent-evidence offered by the defendant; and, second, that the damages assessed are excessive.

The most of the work done by the plaintiff for the defendant was done in the business of house building, and while the plaintiff was learning the trade of a house carpenter. There seems to have been a contract…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harper v. PoundIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Wallace v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Atkinson v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Franklin Life Insurance v. SeftonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Spears v. WardIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. High Wheel Auto Parts Co. v. Journal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Williams v. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API