Legal Opinion

Starkey's v. . McClure

Superior Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1797Published

1Opinion of the Court

One of those persons, who had taken a lot of slaves under this division but who was no party to this suit, was introduced on the part of the plaintiffs, to show that such a division by consent had been made.

The defendant's counsel objected to that person being sworn, on the ground of interest, and on argument, NOTE. — See Ferrel v. Perry, ante, 25, and the cases referred to in Farrell v. Perry, 2 N.C. 2; and also Kaywood v. Barnett, 20 N.C. 88.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kaywood v. . BarnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838