Legal Opinion

In the Interest of N. M. H.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 7, 2001No. A01A1972PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

The biological mother of N. M. H., B. S. H., and G. L. H. appeals the juvenile court’s termination of her parental rights, contending that the evidence was insufficient to support the termination.1 For the reasons below, we affirm.

The standard of review for the termination of parental rights is whether, after reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the parent, a rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the parent’s rights should be lost.2 “This Court neither weighs evidence nor determines the credibility of witnesses;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the Interest of R. N.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. In the Interest of E. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. In the Interest of L. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. In the Interest of J. O. L.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. In the Interest of M. L.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In the Interest of B. J. F.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. In the Interest of A. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. In the Interest of M. S.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. In the Interest of B. B.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. In the Interest of P. O. M.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API