Legal Opinion

Blessing v. Blessing

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew J. Jasen, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the complaint does not comply with rule 280, which reads as follows: “Rule 280. Complaint in action for separation. The complaint in an action for separation must specify particularly the nature and circumstances of the defendant’s misconduct and set forth the time and place of each act complained of with reasonable certainty. ’ ’

Defendant contends that paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 of the complaint contain generalities and conclusions of law and do not set forth particularly the nature and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Earle v. EarleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Alexrod v. AlexrodNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Rasmussen v. RasmussenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  4. Carbone v. CarboneNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Otton v. OttonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kapchan v. KapchanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API