Legal Opinion

California Casualty Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 28, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 94-0257Published

1Opinion of the Court

185 Ariz. 165 (1996)

913 P.2d 505

CALIFORNIA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, A California corporation, Plaintiff, Counter-defendant-Appellee,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Defendant, Counter-claimant-Appellant.

No. 1 CA-CV 94-0257.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

February 27, 1996.

As Corrected February 28, 1996.

Thomas & Burke, P.C. by Benjamin C. Thomas, David W. Davis, Phoenix, for Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant-Appellee.

Bell & O'Connor, P.C. by David M. Bell, Phoenix, for Defendant, Counter-claimant-Appellant.

OPINION

SULT, Judge.

Excess…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conway v. Country Casualty Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus, Georgia, a Georgia Corp. v. United States Fire Company, and Boston Old Colony Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API