Legal Opinion

Clarke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 9, 1992No. 91-711PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, James Clinton Clarke, appeals his conviction and sentence for aggravated assault on a law enforcement officer, as well as the trial court’s order requiring Clarke to make restitution. For the following reasons, we reverse that conviction and vacate the restitution order.

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.510(b) allows a jury to find a defendant guilty of the offense charged or any offense which, as a matter of law, is a necessarily included, or lesser included offense of the offense charged, if supported by the evidence. Permissive lesser included offenses are those offenses which may or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WimberlySupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Amado v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. Wilcott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  4. Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. Medina v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barges Unlimited Inc. and Cornelius J. Tabor, Jr. v. Morgan City Stevendores, LLC, Babin Marine, LLC, Roland Shapley and Lee BabinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. Byrd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Suarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API