Legal Opinion

Bale v. City of Auburn

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 30, 1997No. 38912-2-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

D.E. Bale and other business owners (Bale) in a Parking and Business Improvement Area (BIA) in the City of Auburn commenced this action. Bale seeks to invalidate ordinances establishing the BIA and to recover special assessments levied over a period of years. Bale argues that the City failed to comply with statutorily required procedures when it adopted the ordinances. Because the City’s failure to publish the 1988 ordinance was a defect that was cured by the 1994 reenactment and publication of the new ordinance, we affirm.

In 1988, Auburn business owners petitioned the City to create a BIA.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rice v. Dow Chemical Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Henry v. Town of OakvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. City of Bothell v. GutschmidtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Weiks v. Town of TumwaterWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. LaRose v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bale v. City of AuburnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Pearsall v. Tribal Council for the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of OregonGrand Ronde Tribal Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API