Legal Opinion
Christensen v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 28, 1991No. 41A01-8912-CV-532PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Chief Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Theodore and Susan Christensen (Chris-tensens) appeal from a judgment favoring Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears), Flair International Corporation (Flair), and Alday Comfort, Inc. (Alday) in a personal injury action for damages resulting from an improperly installed furnace vent damper.
We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
ISSUES
We restate the issues presented for review as:
1. Did the trial court err in permitting Sears and the two third-party defendants, Alday and Flair, a total of six peremptory challenges while limiting the Christensens to only…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Patterson Dental Co. v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Jones v. GleimIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Manns v. State of Indiana Department of HighwaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Hebel v. Conrail, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Lazarus Department Store v. SutherlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. IraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- American Legion Pioneer Post No. 340 v. ChristonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- James Bogner v. Teresa BognerIndiana Supreme Court · 2015
- James Reboy and Michelle Reboy v. Cozzi Iron & Metal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Merritt v. Evansville-Vanderburgh School Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.