Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Durden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 6, 1981No. 79-852PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Writ quashed as improvidently granted. By quashing the writ in this cause, we are not to be understood as approving the procedure of qualifying the jury with respect to individual pending criminal cases out of the presence of the defendant and his counsel. The writ is quashed because Petitioner's objection to the composition of the jury came after the jury was impaneled and sworn; and, thus, this objection, although well taken, was untimely.Andrews v. State, 359 So.2d 1172 (Ala.Cr.App. 1978).

WRIT QUASHED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.

TORBERT, C.J., and MADDOX, FAULKNER, JONES, ALMON, SHORES,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Andrews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  4. Fisher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  5. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API