Legal Opinion
Halsey v. Smeltzer
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 28, 2000No. 20A03-9906-CV-237PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge
Appellant-defendant Michael L. Halsey brings an interlocutory appeal from the trial court’s denial of his Motion to Transfer Venue in a case brought against him by appellees-plaintiffs Scott and Carolyn Smeltzer. Specifically, Halsey argues that the Smeltzers’ claims for injuries to chattel are ancillary to their cause of action based upon an automobile collision, and that subsections of Trial Rule 75(A) regarding collisions and the defendant’s residence should apply to determine that his home county is the preferred venue.
FACTS
On January 17,1998, Halsey was operating a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Grove v. ThomasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Diesel Const. Co., Inc. v. CottenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Johnson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- AgMax, Inc. v. Countrymark Cooperative, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- Banjo Corp. v. PemborIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
3Cited by18 opinions
- Noble County v. RogersIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Bostic v. House of James, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- R & D Transport, Inc. v. A.H.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library v. Shook, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Phillips v. ScalfIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.