Legal Opinion

Hinds Community College Dist. v. Muse

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1998No. 97-CA-00606-SCTPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

725 So.2d 207 (1998)

HINDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT and the Mississippi Ethics Commission, By and Through Mississippi Attorney General Mike Moore

v.

Dr. Vernon Clyde MUSE.

No. 97-CA-00606-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

December 17, 1998.

Office of the Attorney General by Lawrence Authur Schemmel, Attorney for Appellants.

Leah Draayer McDowell, John G. Corlew, Jackson, Attorneys for Appellee.

BEFORE SULLIVAN, P.J., McRAE and MILLS, JJ.

MILLS, Justice, for the Court:

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

¶ 1. The Mississippi Attorney General's Office, on behalf of Hinds Community College and the Mississippi Ethics…

Also in this document: Dissent · Smith; Dissent · Smith.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Smith v. SandersMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Frazier v. State by and Through PittmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Lenoir v. Madison CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cassibry v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Mississippi Ethics Com'n v. AsemeMississippi Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Falco Lime, Inc. v. Mayor & Aldermen of City of VicksburgMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mississippi Ethics Commission v. GrishamMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Jones v. HowellMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Moore Ex Rel. City of Aberdeen v. ByarsMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Charles T. Jones v. Bobby M. HowellMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API