Commonwealth v. Roman
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 7, March. T., 1913, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Luzerne Co., April Sessions, 1912, No. 81, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Alfonso Roman. Indictment for assault and battery. Before O’Boyle, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Verdict of guilty, upon which judgment of sentence was passed. Errors assigned were various portions of the charge, including (4) that quoted in the opinion qf the Superior Court,
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Morrison, J.,
The defendant, Alfonso Roman, pleaded not guilty to an indictment charging him in the first count with what is popularly designated as aggravated assault. The second count charged the defendant with simple assault and battery. The trial resulted in a verdict of the jury of not guilty under the first count but guilty in manner and form as indicted under the second count. Thereupon the court sentenced the defendant to pay a fine of $100 and pay the costs of prosecution and undergo imprisonment in the Luzerne county prison for the term of ten calendar months and stand…
2Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GoldbergNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Commonwealth v. BanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. PresognaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. SaccoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Commonwealth v. BanksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.