Legal Opinion

Husqvarna AB v. Environmental Protection Agency

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 29, 2001No. 00-1270PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON.

KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge:

The petitioners, Husqvarna AB et al. (Husqvarna), seek review of the Phase 2 Emission Standards for New Nonroad Spark-Ignition Handheld Engines promulgated by the respondent, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under the authority of section 213 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. § 7547. Husqvarna contends that the final rule is arbitrary and capricious because the EPA failed to select the emission standards that represent the best balance of the factors identified in CAA…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Appalachian Power Company v. Environmental Protection Agency, Public Service Electric & Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. City of Waukesha v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
  2. United States Sugar Corp. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
  3. Kennecott Greens Creek Mining Co. v. Mine Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
  4. National Petrochemical & Refiners Association v. Environmental Protection Agency, International Truck and Engine Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  5. National Ass'n for Surface Finishing v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API