Legal Opinion

Andal v. Osthus

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1952No. File No. 9258PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudolph, J.

Plaintiffs, brought this action to have a contract for the sale of real property specifically performed. The trial court ordered defendants to perform and they have appealed. We affirm the judgment.

Except for the testimony of the defendant, Emma Os-thus, that she was coerced into signing the contract, the evidence is undisputed. The trial court found that Emma and her co-defendant, Mable, signed the contract voluntarily. The evidence amply supports this finding, and disposes of any claimed coercion.

The land involved belonged to Ole Andal in his lifetime. Ole died and left surviving him nine…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ernster v. ChristiansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Bunkers v. GuernseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bunkers v. GuernseySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hannahs v. NoahSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hannahs v. NoahSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API