Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Heindel
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided July 27, 1966PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward S. Silver, J.
The proposed compromise of the cause of action for decedent’s wrongful death and for other incidental relief is granted, The attorney’s compensation for all legal services to and including the decree herein and distribution thereunder is fixed and allowed upon 33%% of the net recovery. The item of disbursement for the report of Doctor Feinberg is allowed in the amount of $50. The other disbursements are fixed and allowed in the requested amount. Petitioner will be reimbursed for the payment of funeral expenses.
The decedent was survived by her husband, a professional man, who has since…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Accounting of KaiserNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- In re the Estate of UravicNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- Uravic v. F. Jarka Company, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Uravic v. F. Jarka Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re AcquafreddaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Estate of SingletonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1978
- In re the Estate of FeldNew York Surrogate's Court · 1992
- Conejero v. LaJamNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- In re the Accounting of Public Administrator of Kings CountyNew York Surrogate's Court · 2009