Poulos v. U-Haul International, Inc.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated January 28, 2002, as, upon, in effect, granting his motion for leave to renew the defendants’ prior motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the complaint, adhered to a prior determination.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

In support of his motion for leave to renew, the plaintiff was required to proffer both new facts not offered on the prior motion to strike the complaint…