Legal Opinion

In Re Wamsley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2000No. 29S00-9906-DI-336PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

Respondent Vaughn A. Wamsley’s advertisement for his legal practice, promi nent on the back cover of the 1997 Indianapolis telephone directory, proclaimed, “Best Possible Settlement ... Least Amount of Time.” That statement and others included in the advertisement represented misleading, deceptive, self-laudatory, and unfair claims and thus violated the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. For that, we find today that the respondent should be publicly admonished.

This case commenced with the Disciplinary Commission’s filing of a Verified Complaint for…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of AnonymousIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farrin v. ThigpenDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2001
  2. In Re KellerIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re BenkieIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. In Re LoomisIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In Re HughesIndiana Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API