Legal Opinion · Dissent

Garnett v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided April 10, 2007No. 3027042Published

1DissentHaley, J., joined by Benton and Elder, Jj.,

We respectfully dissent.

I

This dissent shall examine the facts in the continuum of the relationship between appellant and complainant, because:

The proper standard of materiality [in Brady evaluation] must reflect our overriding concern with the justice of the finding of guilt. Such a finding is permissible only if supported by evidence establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It necessarily follows that if the omitted evidence creates a reasonable doubt that did not otherwise exist, constitutional error has been committed. This means that the omission must be evaluated in the context of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Youngblood v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API