Garnett v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1DissentHaley, J., joined by Benton and Elder, Jj.,
We respectfully dissent.
I
This dissent shall examine the facts in the continuum of the relationship between appellant and complainant, because:
The proper standard of materiality [in Brady evaluation] must reflect our overriding concern with the justice of the finding of guilt. Such a finding is permissible only if supported by evidence establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It necessarily follows that if the omitted evidence creates a reasonable doubt that did not otherwise exist, constitutional error has been committed. This means that the omission must be evaluated in the context of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Youngblood v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.